The AIAC was selected as the arbitral institution in at least 3 international case(s) known by Jus Mundi (2 Commercial Arbitration, 1 Investor-State). 2 of these cases are pending.
The AIAC has adopted to date 1 rules and 0 other documents available on Jus Mundi.
Jus Mundi’s algorithms detected 21 arbitration practitioners who acted as arbitrators, counsel or experts in cases administered by this institution.
- Thai-Lao Lignite Co., Ltd. and Hongsa Lignite v. Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic (II), Composition of the Tribunal, 13 July 2020
Go Premium to unlock all institution analytics
The full access includes metrics on Status of Case, Role, Tribunal/Court/Institution, Applicable Treaty, Economic Sector.GO PREMIUM
List of Cases (3)
Unlock the list of cases - Go Premium
|Date||Case||Type of Case||Status||Economic sector||Rules||Seat of Arbitration||Applicable Law||Applicable Treaty|
|2020||Premium||Investor-State||Premium||Mining and quarrying||UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 2013||Unknown||Unknown||Unknown|
|2020||Premium||Commercial Arbitration||Premium||Financial and insurance activities, Professional, scientific and technical activities||Unknown||Unknown||Unknown||Unknown|
|2016||Premium||Commercial Arbitration||Premium||Mining and quarrying||Unknown||Kuala Lumpur||Unknown||Unknown|
The analytics displayed herein are based on the information collected by Jus Mundi. The information Jus Mundi relies on is by no means exhaustive and does not in any way presume the other activities of this profile.
For any questions relating to the publishing of a decision/award/document, write to us at email@example.com.