The AMCHAM - Brazil was selected as the arbitral institution in at least 3 international case(s) known by Jus Mundi (3 Commercial Arbitration). 1 of these cases is pending.
The AMCHAM - Brazil has adopted to date 4 rules and 0 other documents available on Jus Mundi.
Jus Mundi’s algorithms detected 35 arbitration practitioners who acted as arbitrators, counsel or experts in cases administered by this institution.
- Concessionaire Rodovia Dos Tamoios S.A. v. State of São Paulo and Regulatory Agency for Public Services Delegates of Transportation of the State of São Paulo, AMCHAM Case No. 152/2021, Decision of the Advisory Board of the AMCHAM Arbitration and Mediation Center, 29 January 2021
Go Premium to unlock all institution analytics
The full access includes metrics on Status of Case, Role, Tribunal/Court/Institution, Applicable Treaty, Economic Sector.GO PREMIUM
List of Cases (3)
Unlock the list of cases - Go Premium
|Date||Case||Type of Case||Status||Economic sector||Rules||Seat of Arbitration||Applicable Law||Applicable Treaty|
|2021||Premium||Commercial Arbitration||Premium||Construction||Unknown||São Paulo||Brazil||Unknown|
|2018||Premium||Commercial Arbitration||Premium||Manufacturing||AMCHAM - Brazil Arbitration Rules 2014||São Paulo||Brazil||Unknown|
|2015||Premium||Commercial Arbitration||Premium||Information and communication||AMCHAM - Brazil Arbitration Rules 2014||São Paulo||Brazil||Unknown|
The analytics displayed herein are based on the information collected by Jus Mundi. The information Jus Mundi relies on is by no means exhaustive and does not in any way presume the other activities of this profile.
For any questions relating to the publishing of a decision/award/document, write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org.