The CIArb was selected as the arbitral institution in at least 2 international case(s) known by Jus Mundi (2 Commercial Arbitration). None of these cases are pending.
The CIArb has adopted to date 3 rules and 3 other documents available on Jus Mundi.
Jus Mundi’s algorithms detected 7 arbitration practitioners who acted as arbitrators, counsel or experts in cases administered by this institution.
- Prodigy Finance CM2017-1 DAC v. Penha Cristina Braga Martins, CIArb Case No. PF10, Motion of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington for Entry of Default Judgment and Supporting Memorandum against Defendant Penha Cristina Braga Martins [Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 55(b)], 2020
Go Premium to unlock all institution analytics
The full access includes metrics on Status of Case, Role, Tribunal/Court/Institution, Applicable Treaty, Economic Sector.GO PREMIUM
List of Cases (2)
Unlock the list of cases - Go Premium
|Date||Case||Type of Case||Status||Economic sector||Rules||Seat of Arbitration||Applicable Law||Applicable Treaty|
|2020||Premium||Commercial Arbitration||Premium||Financial and insurance activities||CIArb Business Arbitration Scheme Rules 2019||London||United Kingdom||Unknown|
The analytics displayed herein are based on the information collected by Jus Mundi. The information Jus Mundi relies on is by no means exhaustive and does not in any way presume the other activities of this profile.
For any questions relating to the publishing of a decision/award/document, write to us at email@example.com.