The CMAC was selected as the arbitral institution in at least 2 international case(s) known by Jus Mundi (2 Commercial Arbitration). None of these cases are pending.
The CMAC has adopted to date 4 rules and 0 other documents available on Jus Mundi.
Jus Mundi’s algorithms detected 18 arbitration practitioners who acted as arbitrators, counsel or experts in cases administered by this institution.
- Pactrans Air & Sea, Inc. v. Denvon International Trading, Inc., CMAC Case No. MASH200928, Award, 7 May 2009
Go Premium to unlock all institution analytics
The full access includes metrics on Status of Case, Role, Tribunal/Court/Institution, Applicable Treaty, Economic Sector.GO PREMIUM
List of Cases (2)
Unlock the list of cases - Go Premium
|Date||Case||Type of Case||Status||Economic sector||Rules||Seat of Arbitration||Applicable Law||Applicable Treaty|
|2009||Premium||Commercial Arbitration||Premium||Transportation and storage||CMAC Arbitration Rules (2004)||Shanghai||China||Unknown|
|2008||Premium||Commercial Arbitration||Premium||Transportation and storage, Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles||CMAC Arbitration Rules (2004)||Beijing||China||Unknown|
The analytics displayed herein are based on the information collected by Jus Mundi. The information Jus Mundi relies on is by no means exhaustive and does not in any way presume the other activities of this profile.
For any questions relating to the publishing of a decision/award/document, write to us at email@example.com.