The Institute of Arbitrators and Mediators Australia

About

The IAMA was selected as the arbitral institution in at least 3 international case(s) known by Jus Mundi (3 Commercial Arbitration). None of these cases are pending.


The IAMA has adopted to date 0 rules and 0 other documents available on Jus Mundi.

Check on Jus Mundi Search Engine


Jus Mundi’s algorithms detected 8 arbitration practitioners who acted as arbitrators, counsel or experts in cases administered by this institution.

Check on Jus Mundi Directory


Analytics

Type of Case
Commercial Arbitration: 3

Want more?

Go Premium to unlock all institution analytics

The full access includes metrics on Status of Case, Role, Tribunal/Court/Institution, Applicable Treaty, Economic Sector.

GO PREMIUM

List of Cases (3)

Unlock the list of cases - Go Premium

Date
Case
Type of Case
Status
Economic sector
Rules
Seat of Arbitration
Applicable Law
Applicable Treaty
2014 Premium Commercial Arbitration Premium Financial and insurance activities UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 1976 Melbourne Unknown Unknown
2013 Premium Commercial Arbitration Premium Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
2009 Premium Commercial Arbitration Premium Unknown UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 1976 Brisbane Unknown Unknown

Showing 1 to 3 of 3 results

The analytics displayed herein are based on the information collected by Jus Mundi. The information Jus Mundi relies on is by no means exhaustive and does not in any way presume the other activities of this profile.

For any questions relating to the publishing of a decision/award/document, write to us at contact@jusmundi.com.