Moscow Chamber of Commerce and Industry

About

The MCCI was selected as the arbitral institution in at least 4 international case(s) known by Jus Mundi (3 Investor-State, 1 Commercial Arbitration). None of these cases are pending.


The MCCI has adopted to date 2 rules and 0 other documents available on Jus Mundi.

Check on Jus Mundi Search Engine


Jus Mundi’s algorithms detected 23 arbitration practitioners who acted as arbitrators, counsel or experts in cases administered by this institution.

Check on Jus Connect


Analytics

Type of Case
Investor-State: 3
Commercial Arbitration: 1

Want more?

Go Premium to unlock all institution analytics

The full access includes metrics on Status of Case, Role, Tribunal/Court/Institution, Applicable Treaty, Economic Sector.

GO PREMIUM

List of Cases (4)

Unlock the list of cases - Go Premium

Date
Case
Type of Case
Status
Economic sector
Rules
Seat of Arbitration
Applicable Law
Applicable Treaty
2013 Premium Investor-State Premium Construction MCCI Rules of the Arbitration 2012 Moscow Unknown CIS Investor Rights Convention (1997), Kazakhstan - Kyrgyzstan BIT (1997)
2013 Premium Investor-State Premium Real estate activities MCCI Rules of the Arbitration 2012 Moscow Unknown CIS Investor Rights Convention (1997)
2013 Premium Investor-State Premium Mining and quarrying MCCI Rules of the Arbitration 2012 Unknown Unknown CIS Investor Rights Convention (1997)
2002 Premium Commercial Arbitration Premium Information and communication UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 1976 Moscow Unknown Unknown

Showing 1 to 4 of 4 results

The analytics displayed herein are based on the information collected by Jus Mundi. The information Jus Mundi relies on is by no means exhaustive and does not in any way presume the other activities of this profile.

For any questions relating to the publishing of a decision/award/document, write to us at contact@jusmundi.com.