The MCCI was selected as the arbitral institution in at least 4 international case(s) known by Jus Mundi (3 Investor-State, 1 Commercial Arbitration). None of these cases are pending.
The MCCI has adopted to date 2 rules and 0 other documents available on Jus Mundi.
Jus Mundi’s algorithms detected 23 arbitration practitioners who acted as arbitrators, counsel or experts in cases administered by this institution.
LatestBrowse all available documents
Go Premium to unlock all institution analytics
The full access includes metrics on Status of Case, Role, Tribunal/Court/Institution, Applicable Treaty, Economic Sector.GO PREMIUM
List of Cases (4)
Unlock the list of cases - Go Premium
|Date||Case||Type of Case||Status||Economic sector||Rules||Seat of Arbitration||Applicable Law||Applicable Treaty|
|2013||Premium||Investor-State||Premium||Construction||MCCI Rules of the Arbitration 2012||Moscow||Unknown||CIS Investor Rights Convention (1997), Kazakhstan - Kyrgyzstan BIT (1997)|
|2013||Premium||Investor-State||Premium||Real estate activities||MCCI Rules of the Arbitration 2012||Moscow||Unknown||CIS Investor Rights Convention (1997)|
|2013||Premium||Investor-State||Premium||Mining and quarrying||MCCI Rules of the Arbitration 2012||Unknown||Unknown||CIS Investor Rights Convention (1997)|
|2002||Premium||Commercial Arbitration||Premium||Information and communication||UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 1976||Moscow||Unknown||Unknown|
The analytics displayed herein are based on the information collected by Jus Mundi. The information Jus Mundi relies on is by no means exhaustive and does not in any way presume the other activities of this profile.
For any questions relating to the publishing of a decision/award/document, write to us at email@example.com.