The SCIETAC is linked to least 1 international case(s) known by Jus Mundi (1 Commercial Arbitration). None of these cases are pending.
The SCIETAC has adopted to date 0 rules and 0 other documents available on Jus Mundi.
Check on Jus Mundi Search Engine
Jus Mundi’s algorithms detected 2 arbitration and international law practitioners who have acted as arbitrators, judges, panelists, counsel or experts in cases linked to this institution.
- Guangdong Changhong Electric Co. Ltd. v. Inspur Electronics (HK) Limited, Decision of the Court of First Instance of the High Court of Hong Kong HCCT 43/2013, 7 May 2012
Type of Case
Go Premium to unlock all institution analytics
The full access includes metrics on Status of Case, Role, Tribunal/Court/Institution, Applicable Treaty, Economic Sector.GO PREMIUM
List of Cases (1)
Unlock the list of cases - Go Premium
|Date||Case||Type of Case||Status||Economic sector||Rules||Seat of Arbitration||Applicable Law||Applicable Treaty|
Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles
SCIETAC Arbitration Rules (version not specified)
The analytics displayed herein are based on the information collected by Jus Mundi. The information Jus Mundi relies on is by no means exhaustive and does not in any way presume the other activities of this profile.
For any questions relating to the publishing of a decision/award/document, write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org.