• Copy the reference
  • Tutorial video

Second Interim Award on Interim Measures


(A) The Tribunal made its First Interim Award on 25 January 2012, pending the oral hearing on 11 February 2012 (the "Hearing") and this Second Interim Award;

(B) The Claimants made their applications for further interim measures (in different terms) by letters dated 4 and 12 January 2012 and at the Hearing; and by letters dated 9, 13 and 24 January 2012 and at the Hearing, the Respondent (inter alia) disputed the Claimants’ applications;

(C) The Hearing took place on 11 February 2012 in Washington DC, USA, attended by the Parties’ legal representatives; and

(D) The Tribunal has considered the Parties’ several written and oral submissions made to the Tribunal in regard to interim measures and further considered all relevant circumstances current in this arbitration up to the date of the Hearing;


Bearing in mind the Respondent’s several obligations under the Treaty and international law, including the Respondent’s obligation to carry out and provide for the enforcement of an award on the merits of the Parties’ dispute in these arbitration proceedings and the Tribunal’s mission (required under the arbitration agreement) efficaciously and fairly to decide the Parties’ dispute by a final award, the Tribunal hereby orders:

(i) the Respondent (whether by its judicial, legislative or executive branches) to take all measures necessary to suspend or cause to be suspended the enforcement and recognition within and without Ecuador of the judgments by the Provincial Court of Sucumbíos, Sole Division (Corte Provincial de Justicia de Sucumbíos, Sala Unica de la Corte Provincial de Justicia de Sucumbíos) of 3 January 2012 and of 13 January 2012 (and, to the extent confirmed by the said judgments, of the judgment by Judge Nicolás Zambrano Lozada of 14 February 2011) against the First Claimant in the Ecuadorian legal proceedings known as "the Lago Agrio Case";

(ii) in particular, without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, such measures to preclude any certification by the Respondent that would cause the said judgments to be enforceable against the First Claimant; and

(iii) the Respondent’s Government to continue to inform this Tribunal, by the Respondent’s legal representatives in these arbitration proceedings, of all measures which the Respondent has taken for the implementation of its legal obligations under this Second Interim Award;

until any further order or award made by the Tribunal in these arbitration proceedings;

The Tribunal determines that the Claimants shall be legally responsible, jointly and severally, to the Respondent for any costs or losses which the Respondent may suffer in performing its legal obligations under this Second Interim Award, as may be decided by the Tribunal within these arbitration proceedings (to the exclusion of any other jurisdiction); and further that, as security for such contingent responsibility the Claimants shall deposit within thirty days of the date of this Second Interim Award the amount of US$ 50,000,000.00 (United States Dollars Fifty Million) with the Permanent Court of Arbitration in a manner to be designated separately, to the order of this Tribunal;
The Tribunal dismisses the application made by the Respondent to vacate its order for interim measures of 9 February 2011;
The Tribunal’s existing orders for interim measures (as recited in the First Interim Award) and the First Interim Award shall continue to have effect subject to the terms of this Second Interim Award;
This Second Interim Award is and shall remain subject to modification at any time before the Tribunal’s final award in these arbitration proceedings; and, in the. meantime, any of the Parties may also apply to the Tribunal for such modification upon seventy-two hours’ written notice for good cause shown, including any material change in the legal or factual circumstances prevailing as at the date of the Hearing;
This Second Interim Award is made strictly without prejudice to the merits of the Parties’ substantive and other procedural disputes, including the Respondent’s objections as to jurisdiction, admissibility and merits;
This Second Interim Award shall take effect forthwith as an Interim Award, being immediately final and binding upon all Parties as an award subject only to any subsequent modification as herein provided, whether upon the Tribunal’s own initiative or any Party’s application; and
This Interim Award, although separately signed by the Tribunal’s members on three signing pages constitutes an "interim award" signed by the three arbitrators under Article 32 of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules.
Subsequent citations of this document as a whole:
Subsequent citations of this excerpt:
Click on the text to select an element Click elsewhere to unselect an element
Select a key word :
1 /

Instantly access the most relevant case law, treaties and doctrine.

Start your Free Trial

Already registered ?