Because the award at issue arises from a commercial arbitration involving foreign parties, this motion practice is brought pursuant to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of June 10, 1958 (the "New York Convention"). See
21 U.S.T. 2517, 330 U.N.T.S. 38; codified in part at
9 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq.
Therefore, the award at issue here must be vacated if it violates one of the principles enumerated in Article V of the New York Convention
. Since the award was rendered in New York, the grounds for vacatur under the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") are also applicable to the extent that they do not conflict with the New York Convention. See
9 U.S.C. § 208; see also Yusuf Ahmed Alghanim & Sons v. Toys "R" Us, Inc.
, 126 F.3d 15, 23 (2d Cir. 1997) ("The Convention specifically contemplates that the state in which, or under the law of which, the award is made, will be free to set aside or modify an award in accordance with its domestic arbitral law and its full panoply of express and implied grounds for relief").