• Copy the reference
  • Tutorial video

Gabriel Resources v. Romania

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Nature of the proceedings:
International
Type of case:
Investor-State
Economic sector:
Mining and quarrying
Mining of metal ores
Date of introduction:
21 July 2015
Status of the case:
Pending
Claimant’s country of origin:
Canada
,
United Kingdom
Respondent:
Romania
Institution:
ICSID (International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes)
Rules of arbitration:
Applicable treaties:
Canada - Romania BIT (200...
Romania - United Kingdom...

Documents of the case

profile picture Teresa Cheng President
profile picture Horacio A. Grigera Naón Appointed by the investor
profile picture Zachary Douglas Appointed by the State
Source(s) of the individual document(s):
Reproduced with the permission of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes :
Link1 (EN) Official source

Lawyers, other representatives, expert(s), tribunal’s secretary

    Tribunal’s Decision on the Claimants’ Request for Emergency Temporary Provisional Measures (Letter)

    In the absence of Ms. Sara Marzal from the office, I write to you on instructions from the Tribunal regarding the Claimants' Request for Emergency Temporary Provisional Measures of July 28, 2016.

    The Tribunal has considered Respondent's communication of August 10, 2016, Claimants' communication of August 11, 2016, as well as the parties' views presented at the Tribunal's first session of August 12, 2016, concerning the above matter.

    After careful consideration, the Tribunal has unanimously decided as follows:

    a) The Claimants' Request for Emergency Temporary Provisional Measures is denied. In order to expedite the procedure, the Tribunal decides to communicate this decision without detailing its reasoning. A reasoned decision will follow.

     

    b) The Tribunal notes that, in accordance with the letter sent on its behalf by the Secretary of the Tribunal on August 3, 2016, the Parties will have ample opportunity to fully present their arguments on the Second Request for Provisional Measures in their written observations, including on the particular request related to the enforcement of the VAT. The Tribunal will decide on the Claimants Second Request for Provisional Measures shortly thereafter.

    c) Either party may bring to the Tribunal's attention any new, relevant, facts that may emerge fundamentally changing the current circumstances.

    Subsequent citations of this document as a whole:
    Subsequent citations of this excerpt:
    Click on the text to select an element Click elsewhere to unselect an element
    Select a key word :
    1 /

    Instantly access the most relevant case law, treaties and doctrine.

    Start your Free Trial

    Already registered ?