(a) For each of Claimants' BIT claims, at what exact point in time was the breach consummated? What precise measure attributable to Respondent resulted in the alleged breach for each claim?
(b) Did Claimants' alleged losses occur (or begin to occur) at the same point in time that the breach is said to have been consummated in respect of each claim? Should Claimants' alleged losses be quantified on the date upon which each breach is alleged to have occurred? If not, is the point in time when Claimants' alleged losses occurred relevant to establishing liability for a breach in respect of each claim?
(c) Does conduct attributed to Respondent equate to a systematic State policy or practice that may be characterized as a composite act in breach of the relevant BIT pursuant to Article 15 of the Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts? The Parties may refer to commentary on state responsibility and/or Article 15 of the Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts in developing their answers.
(d) How and to what extent should public opinion and its impact upon the political situation in Romania be factored into the assessment of liability and damages under the relevant BIT?
(e) Do Claimants maintain that the process leading to the submission of a draft law to Parliament in August 2013 and its subsequent rejection by Parliament was a standalone breach of the relevant BIT or an element of a wider course of conduct that resulted in a breach of the BIT? Was there any breach of Romanian law in the process leading to the submission of the draft law and its ultimate rejection by Parliament?
(f) Do Claimants maintain that there was a breach of the relevant BIT after the rejection of the draft law by Parliament by reference to acts of Respondent occurring solely during the period after that rejection (i.e., independently of any acts leading up to that rejection)? If so, what precise act/s are said to constitute the breach?
Already registered ?