• Copy the reference
  • Tutorial video

Gabriel Resources v. Romania

Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31
Nature of the proceedings:
International
Type of case:
Investor-State
Economic sector:
Mining and quarrying
Mining of metal ores
Date of introduction:
21 July 2015
Status of the case:
Pending
Claimant’s country of origin:
Canada
,
United Kingdom
Respondent:
Romania
Institution:
ICSID (International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes)
Rules of arbitration:
Applicable treaties:
Canada - Romania BIT (200...
Romania - United Kingdom...

Documents of the case

profile picture Horacio A. Grigera Naón Appointed by the investor
profile picture Zachary Douglas Appointed by the State
profile picture Teresa Cheng President
Source(s) of the individual document(s):
Reproduced with the permission of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes :
Link1 (EN) Official source

Lawyers, other representatives, expert(s), tribunal’s secretary

Procedural Order No. 4

Introduction

1.
The Tribunal refers to:

• Claimants' letter of November 23, 2016 requesting the Tribunal to fix the procedural calendar and proposing certain adjustment to the timetable included as Annex A of Procedural Order No. 1 (“Claimants' Procedural Calendar Proposal”);

• Respondent's letter of November 28, 2016 objecting to Claimants' Procedural Calendar Proposal and submitting two alternative procedural calendars (“Respondent's Procedural Calendar Option 1” and “Respondent's Procedural Calendar Option 2”).

• Claimants' letter of December 5, 2016 submitting observations to Respondent's letter of November 28, 2016 and requesting an opportunity to respond to Respondent's December 12, 2016 letter; and

• Respondent's letter of December 12, 2016 submitting observations to Claimants' letter of December 5, 2016 and objecting to Claimants' request to be given an opportunity to respond to Respondent's December 12, 2016 letter.

2.
Having reviewed and considered the Parties' arguments in the referred communications, has decided as follows:

Order

1. The Tribunal considers that it has been sufficiently briefed on this matter and therefore rejects Claimants's request to submit observations on Respondent's letter of Deceber 12, 2016.

2. The Tribunal adopts Respondent's Procedural Calendar Option 1 as the Procedural Calendar of this case, which is attached to this Procedural Order as Annex A.

3.Howerver, the Tribunal is mindful that delays in document production might impact upon Claimants' ability to prepare its Reply and would therefore be open to consider a prolongation of the Reply's deadline should the Claimants request it and the circumstances so require.

Subsequent citations of this document as a whole:
Subsequent citations of this excerpt:
Click on the text to select an element Click elsewhere to unselect an element
Select a key word :
1 /

This feature requires a subscription

Get access to the most extensive & reliable source of information in arbitration

REQUEST A FREE TRIAL

Already registered ?