Find out all Jus Mundi tutorial videos in : https://tutorial.jusmundi.com
In less than 3 minutes you'll find everything you need to know about Jus Mundi and how to take full advantage of our search engine.
|
Appointed by the investor |
|
Appointed by the State |
|
President |
• The letter received on March 14, 2017 on behalf of Alburnos Maior, Greenpeace CEE Romania and Independent Centre for the Development of Environmental Resources (the “Prospective Amici”), in which they request the Tribunal to provide, inter alia, “information detailing under what circumstances expert reports and witness statements may at all be released to the general public or to prospective Amici alone.”
• The observations submitted by both Parties on April 5, 2017 on the said letter of March 14, 2017.
• Under Section I.3 of Annex C of the Agreement between the Government of Canada and the Government of Romania for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, done at Bucharest on May 8, 2009 (the “Canada-Romania BIT”), “[a]ll documents submitted to, or issued by, the tribunal shall be publicly available, unless the disputing parties otherwise agree, subject to the deletion of confidential information.” [emphasis added]
• Pursuant to Section III.8 of Annex C of the Canada-Romania BIT and Section 24.2 of Procedural Order No.1, access to documents by non-disputing parties will be governed by the same rules applicable to the public in general, that is, Section I.3 cited above.
• According to the second paragraph of of Procedural Order No. 3 (the “Confidentiality Order”), the ICSID Secretariat will publish all of the principal submissions, but not the supporting witness statements, expert reports, exhibits or legal authorities. This is also provided in Section 2.8, second sentence, under which “[t]he ICSID Secretariat shall not publish supporting witness statements, expert reports, and exhibits, even if they have been reclassified as not constituting or containing confidential information.” [emphasis added].
• Sections 3.13 and 3.14 of the Confidentiality Order provide that the Order shall be effective and binding upon both Parties upon its signature by the Tribunal and may only be amended or derogated by the Tribunal at the request of one of the Parties “if compelling circumstances so require.”
i. both Parties agree otherwise, or
ii. the Tribunal decides to amend or derogate from Section 2.8 of the Confidentiality Order in accordance with its Section 3.14 (i.e., at the request of one of the Parties and if the Tribunal decides that “compelling circumstances so require”).
i. both Parties agree otherwise, or
ii. the Tribunal decides to amend or derogate from Section 2.8 of the Confidentiality Order in accordance with its Section 3.14.
Access to the PDF of this document is reserved upon request to subscribers of Jus Mundi - Legal Practice offer. The HTML version of this document remains fully available on our website.
This Wiki Note has not been submitted yet.
We continuously identify new themes to add to the existing Wiki Notes as well as Contributors to author new Notes.
Become a Contributor, submit your candidacy to author this Wiki Note.
Delete an existing alert to create a new one
Delete an existing alert to create a new one
Get access to the most extensive & reliable source of information in arbitration
REQUEST A FREE TRIALAlready registered ?
Success!
An error just occurred, please try again
Get access to the most extensive & reliable source of information in arbitration