Although due diligence is not a term used in the International Law Commission's Articles on State Responsibility, it is considered a legal standard of conduct whose content and extent vary according to the applicable primary rule of international law.6
Mcdonald, N., The Role of Due Diligence In International Law, Cambridge University Press for the British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2019, p. 1044.
There is not a uniform standard of conduct of due diligence,7 but it is determined "on a case-by-case basis"8 and is at the centre of many areas of international law,9 such as the obligation of a State not to "allow knowingly its territory to be used for acts contrary to the rights of other States",10 international environmental law,11 law of the sea,12 international humanitarian law,13 human rights law,14 and business and human rights.15
Responsibilities and obligations of States sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in the Area, ITLOS Case No. 17, Advisory Opinion, 01 February 2011, para. 117; The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People's Republic of China), PCA Case No. 2013-19, Award, 12 July 2016, para. 754; Stephens, T. and French, D., ILA Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law, Second Report, July 2016, p. 3.
Mcdonald, N., The Role of Due Diligence In International Law, Cambridge University Press for the British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2019, p. 1042.
Trail smelter case (United States of America, Canada), Award, 11 March 1941, p. 1965; Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), Judgment, 20 April 2010, para. 101; Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, 08 July 1996, para. 29; Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica), Judgment - Merits, 16 December 2015, paras. 104, 153.
Responsibilities and obligations of States sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in the Area, ITLOS Case No. 17, Advisory Opinion, 01 February 2011, paras. 108, 110; The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People's Republic of China), PCA Case No. 2013-19, Award, 12 July 2016, paras. 744, 754.
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), Judgment - Counter-claims, 19 December 2005, paras. 173, 189, 345; Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, 26 February 2007, para. 429, 430; Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, 12 August 1949, Arts. 1, 3; Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea, 12 August 1949, Arts. 1, 3; Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949, Arts. 1, 3; Geneva Convention relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of war, 12 August 1949, Arts. 1, 3; Dörmann, K. and Serralvo, J., Common Article 1 to the Geneva Conventions and the obligation to prevent international humanitarian law violations, International Review of the Red Cross, 2015, p. 735; International Committee of the Red Cross, Commentary of 2016 Article 3: Conflicts not of an international character, 2016, para. 751; International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, The Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu, Judgement, 1 June 2001, paras. 432-445; Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment - Merits, 27 June 1986, paras. 154-157; International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991, Prosecutor v. Du[Ko Tadi], 15 July 1999, paras. 115-145; Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, 26 February 2007, para. 430; Kenneth P. Yeager v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, IUSCT Case No. 10199, Award (Award No. 324-10199-1), 02 November 1987, paras. 43, 45; Stephens, T. and French, D., ILA Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law, Second Report, July 2016, pp. 11-12.
European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 30054/96, Kelly and Others v United Kingdom, 4 May 2001, para. 96; Inter-American Court on Human Rights, Case of Vélasquez Rodriguez v Honduras, Judgement (Merits), 29 July 1998, para. 172; European Court of Human Rights, Osman v. the United Kingdom, Judgment, 28 October 1998, para. 116; African Commission on Human Rights, Case 245/02: Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum v Zimbabwe, 11-15 May 2006, paras. 143, 145-147; European Committee on Social Rights, European Roma Rights Center v. Greece, Complaint no. 15/2003, Decision on the merits, 8 December 2004, paras. 42, 46-47.
Bonnitcha, J. and McCorquodale, R., The Concept of ‘Due Diligence’ in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, The European Journal of International Law, 2017, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 899-919.
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, 26 February 2007, para. 430; Responsibilities and obligations of States sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in the Area, ITLOS Case No. 17, Advisory Opinion, 01 February 2011, para. 110; Campbell, E., Dominic, E., Stadnik, S. and Wu, Y., Due Diligence Obligations Of International Organizations Under International Law, International Law and Politics, 2018, Vol. 50, p. 568.
Investment treaty jurisprudence has recognised that investors have an obligation of due diligence. In particular, in the context of legitimate expectations of investors, "it is generally considered that investors should themselves act with due diligence."18
Campbell, E., Dominic, E., Stadnik, S. and Wu, Y., Due Diligence Obligations Of International Organizations Under International Law, International Law and Politics, 2018, Vol. 50, p. 565.
Levashova, Y., The Role of Investor’s Due Diligence in International Investment Law: Legitimate Expectations of Investors, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, April 22, 2020.
Stephens, T. and French, D., ILA Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law, First Report, March 2014, p. 10; Alasdair Ross Anderson and others v. Republic of Costa Rica, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/3, Award, 19 May 2010, para. 58; Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Limited v. United Republic of Tanzania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008, para. 602; Eudoro Armando Olguín v. Republic of Paraguay, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/5, Award, 26 July 2001, para. 75; Parkerings-Compagniet AS v. Republic of Lithuania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, Award, 11 September 2007, para. 333; MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. v. Chile, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7, Award, 25 May 2004, paras. 173, 178, 243, 246; Stadtwerke München GmbH and others v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/1, Award, 02 December 2019, paras. 264, 308; Belenergia S.A. v. Italian Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/40, Award, 06 August 2019, paras. 584, 585, 587; Foresight Luxembourg Solar 1 S.À.R.L., et al. v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case No. 2015/150, Partial Dissenting Opinion of Arbitrator Raúl E. Vinuesa, para. 40; Isolux Infrastructure Netherlands B.V. v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case No. V2013/153, Award, 12 July 2016, para. 781; Total S.A. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/1, Dissenting Opinion of Henri Álvarez (Decision on Liability), para. 60; Cavalum SGPS, S.A. v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/34, Decision on Jurisdiction, Liability and Directions on Quantum, 31 August 2020, paras. 470-474; Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula and others v. Romania (II), ICSID Case No. ARB/14/29, Award, 5 March 2020, para. 363; Consutel Group S.P.A. in liquidazione v. People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, PCA Case No. 2017-33, Final Award, 03 February 2020, paras. 473-474; Watkins Holdings S.à r.l. and others v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/44, Award, 21 January 2020, paras. 571-572, 588-589; Infracapital F1 S.à r.l. and Infracapital Solar B.V. v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, Liability and Directions on Quantum, 13 September 2021, paras. 573, 598.
Some tribunals have also considered that investors should exercise due diligence with regard to the laws of the host State19 as well as on third parties' activities related to the investment.20
Alasdair Ross Anderson and others v. Republic of Costa Rica, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/3, Award, 19 May 2010, para. 58; Reinhard Hans Unglaube v. Republic of Costa Rica, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/20, Award, 16 May 2012, para. 258; Athena Investments A/S (formerly Greentech Energy Systems A/S) and others v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case No. V2015/150, Partial Dissenting Opinion of Co-Arbitrator Raul E. Vinuesa, 14 November 2018, paras. 39-51; FREIF Eurowind Holdings Ltd v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case No. 2017/060, Final Award, 8 March 2021, paras. 544-551.
Investors' due diligence in making an investment (or lack thereof) is therefore relevant to a tribunal's findings on the merits of a claimant-investors' claims.21 However, there have been dissenting opinions noting that due diligence is not a condition to the protection of an investment.22 See also Investor conduct.
Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24, Award, 27 August 2008, paras. 268-270; Joseph Charles Lemire v. Ukraine (II), ICSID Case No. ARB/06/18, Decision on Jurisdiction and Liability, 14 January 2010, para. 285; Alasdair Ross Anderson and others v. Republic of Costa Rica, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/3, Award, 19 May 2010, para. 58; Reinhard Hans Unglaube v. Republic of Costa Rica, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/20, Award, 16 May 2012, para. 258; Marion Unglaube v. Republic of Costa Rica, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/1, Award, 16 May 2012, para. 258; Antaris Solar GmbH and Dr. Michael Göde v. The Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2014-01, Award, 2 May 2018, para. 432; Rusoro Mining Ltd. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/5, Award, 22 August 2016, para. 525; Parkerings-Compagniet AS v. Republic of Lithuania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, Award, 11 September 2007, para. 333; South American Silver Limited (Bermuda) v. The Plurinational State of Bolivia, PCA Case No. 2013-15, Award, 30 August 2018, para. 648; Invesmart v. Czech Republic, Award, 26 June 2009, paras. 254, 272-282, 296; Mr. Jürgen Wirtgen, Mr. Stefan Wirtgen, and JSW Solar (zwei) GmbH & Co.KG v. Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2014-03, 11 October 2017, Final Award, Dissenting Opinion of Arbitrator Gary Born, para. 98; Cube Infrastructure Fund SICAV and others v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/20, Decision on Jurisdiction, Liability and a Partial Decision on Quantum, 19 February 2019, para. 393; InfraRed Environmental Infrastructure GP Limited and others v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/12, Award, 2 August 2019, paras. 371, 447; RWE Innogy GmbH and RWE Innogy Aersa S.A.U. v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/34, Decision on Jurisdiction, Liability, and Certain Issues of Quantum, 30 December 2019, paras. 507, 513; Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Ltd v. Republic of Indonesia, PCA Case No. 2015-40, Final Award, 29 March 2019, paras. 317-320; Eco Oro Minerals Corp. v. Republic of Colombia, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/41, Decision on Jurisdiction, Liability and Directions on Quantum, 9 September 2021, paras. 681-682, 694; Sevilla Beheer B.V. and others v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/27, Decision on Jurisdiction, Liability and the Principles of Quantum, 11 February 2022, paras. 885-886, 894, 898.
Antaris Solar GmbH and Dr. Michael Göde v. The Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2014-01, 2 May 2018, Award, Dissenting Opinion of Gary Born, paras. 74, 77; Mr. Jürgen Wirtgen, Mr. Stefan Wirtgen, and JSW Solar (zwei) GmbH & Co.KG v. Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2014-03, 11 October 2017, Final Award, Dissenting Opinion of Arbitrator Gary Born, paras. 99, 103.
Arbitral tribunals have considered whether a respondent-State exercised due diligence with regard to substantive standards of protections,23 particularly the standard of full protection and security.24
Asian Agricultural Products Ltd. (AAPL) v. Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, 27 June 1990, paras. 50, 67, 69; Pantechniki S.A. Contractors & Engineers v. Republic of Albania, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/21, Award, 30 July 2009, paras. 81-84; Vannessa Ventures Ltd v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/04/6, Award, 16 January 2013, para. 223; Mobil Exploration and Development Inc. Suc. Argentina and Mobil Argentina S.A. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/16, Decision on Jurisdiction and Liability, 10 April 2013, paras. 999, 1002; South American Silver Limited (Bermuda) v. The Plurinational State of Bolivia, PCA Case No. 2013-15, Award, 30 August 2018, paras. 686-687; A.M.F. Aircraftleasing Meier & Fischer GmbH & Co. KG v. Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2017-15, Final Award, 11 May 2020, para. 661; Ulysseas, Inc. v. The Republic of Ecuador, PCA Case No. 2009-19, Final Award, 12 June 2012, para. 272; Infinito Gold Ltd. v. Republic of Costa Rica, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/5, Award, 3 June 2021, para. 627.
Indeed the standard of full protection and security does not impose strict liability, but an obligation of "vigilance."25
Mobil Exploration and Development Inc. Suc. Argentina and Mobil Argentina S.A. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/16, Decision on Jurisdiction and Liability, 10 April 2013, para. 999; Ulysseas, Inc. v. The Republic of Ecuador, PCA Case No. 2009-19, Final Award, 12 June 2012, para. 272; Sergei Paushok, CJSC Golden East Company and CJSCVostokneftegaz Company v. The Government of Mongolia, Award on Jurisdiction and Liability, 28 April 2011, paras. 323-325; American Manufacturing & Trading, Inc. v. Republic of Zaire, ICSID Case No. ARB/93/1, Award, 21 February 1997, paras. 6.05, 6.06; Saluka Investments BV v. The Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2001-04, Partial Award, 17 March 2006, para. 484; Noble Ventures, Inc. v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/11, Award, 12 October 2005, paras. 164, 166; Rumeli Telekom A.S. and Telsim Mobil Telekomunikasyon Hizmetleri A.S. v. Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/16, Award, 29 July 2008, para. 668; Plama Consortium Limited v. Republic of Bulgaria, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24, Award, 27 August 2008, para. 179; Waguih Elie George Siag and Clorinda Vecchi v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/15, Award, 01 June 2009, para. 447; Pantechniki S.A. Contractors & Engineers v. Republic of Albania, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/21, Award, 30 July 2009, para. 81; AWG Group Ltd. v. The Argentine Republic, Decision on Liability, 30 July 2010, paras. 162-164; Sergei Paushok, CJSC Golden East Company and CJSCVostokneftegaz Company v. The Government of Mongolia, Award on Jurisdiction and Liability, 28 April 2011, paras. 323-325; Toto Costruzioni Generali S.p.A. v. Republic of Lebanon, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/12, Award, 07 June 2012, para. 227; Mamidoil Jetoil Greek Petroleum Products Societe Anonyme S.A. v. Republic of Albania, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/24, Award, 30 March 2015, para. 821; Bernhard von Pezold and others v. Republic of Zimbabwe, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/15, Award, 28 July 2015, para. 596; Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Ltd v. Republic of Indonesia, PCA Case No. 2015-40, Final Award, 29 March 2019, para. 267; UAB E energija (Lithuania) v. Republic of Latvia, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/33, Award of the Tribunal, 22 December 2017, para. 840; Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Award, 27 March 2020, paras. 668, 677; Ampal-American Israel Corp., EGI-Fund (08-10) Investors LLC, EGI-Series Investments LLC, BSS-EMG Investors LLC and David Fischer v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/11, Decision on Liability and Heads of Loss, 21 February 2017, para. 241; Frontier Petroleum Services Ltd. v. The Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2008-09, Final Award, 12 November 2010, paras. 269-270; Peter A. Allard v. The Government of Barbados, PCA Case No. 2012-06, Award, 27 June 2016, paras. 249-252; Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, S.A. and Vivendi Universal, S.A. (formerly Aguas Argentinas, S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, S.A. and Vivendi Universal, S.A.) v. Argentine Republic (II), ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19, Decision on Liability, 30 July 2010, para. 162.
Parkerings-Compagniet AS v. Republic of Lithuania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, Award, 11 September 2007, para. 333; SolEs Badajoz GmbH v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/38, Award, 31 July 2019, para. 331; Cube Infrastructure Fund SICAV and others v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/20, Decision on Jurisdiction, Liability and a Partial Decision on Quantum, 19 February 2019, paras. 393, 396, 439; Novenergia II - Energy & Environment (SCA) (Grand Duchy of Luxembourg), SICAR v. The Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case No. 2015/063, Final Award, 15 February 2018, paras. 595, 600, 679; Stadtwerke München GmbH and others v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/1, Award, 2 December 2019, paras. 264, 308.
SolEs Badajoz GmbH v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/38, Award, 31 July 2019, para. 331; Stadtwerke München GmbH and others v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/1, Award, 2 December 2019, paras. 264, 304; Antaris Solar GmbH and Dr. Michael Göde v. The Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2014-01, Award, 2 May 2018, para. 432; Belenergia S.A. v. Italian Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/40, Award, 6 August 2019, paras. 584-585, 587; Foresight Luxembourg Solar 1 S.À.R.L., et al. v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case No. 2015/150, Final Award, 14 November 2018, para. 380; OperaFund Eco-Invest SICAV PLC and Schwab Holding AG v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/36, 6 September 2019, Award, Dissenting Opinionon on Liability and Quantum by Arbitrator Philippe Sands, paras. 20; Guaracachi America, Inc. and Rurelec PLC v. The Plurinational State of Bolivia, PCA Case No. 2011-17, Award, 31 January 2014, para. 465; Georg Gavrilovic and Gavrilovic d.o.o. v. Republic of Croatia, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/39, Award, 26 July 2018, paras. 986, 1012; SunReserve Luxco Holdings SRL v. Italy, SCC Case No. 132/2016, Final Award, 25 March 2020, para. 714; Mamidoil Jetoil Greek Petroleum Products Societe Anonyme S.A. v. Republic of Albania, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/24, Award, 30 March 2015, para. 671.
As to full protection and security, the host State's obligation to exercise due diligence is assessed against the host State's general political situation.28
Pantechniki S.A. Contractors & Engineers v. Republic of Albania, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/21, Award, 30 July 2009, paras. 71-76; Ampal-American Israel Corp., EGI-Fund (08-10) Investors LLC, EGI-Series Investments LLC, BSS-EMG Investors LLC and David Fischer v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/11, Decision on Liability and Heads of Loss, 21 February 2017, paras. 283; Cengiz İnşaat Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S v. Libya, ICC Case No. 21537/ZF/AYZ, Award, 07 November 2018, paras. 376-377; Öztaş Construction, Construction Materials Trading Inc. v. State of Libya, ICC Case No. 21603/ZF/AYZ, Final Award, 14 June 2018, para. 162.
Bonnitcha, J. and McCorquodale, R., The Concept of ‘‘Due Diligence’’ in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, 2017, The European Journal of International Law Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 899-919.
Corino, C., Environmental Due Diligence, 9 European Environmental Law Review, 2000, p. 120.
Davitti, D., On the Meanings of International Investment Law and International Human Rights Law: The Alternative Narrative of Due Diligence, Human Rights Law Review, Volume 12, Issue 3, September 2012, p. 445.
Hessbruegge, J., The Historical Development of the Doctrines of Attribution and Due Diligence in International Law, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2004, p. 268.
Levashova, Y., The Role of Investor’s Due Diligence in International Investment Law: Legitimate Expectations of Investors, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 22 April 2020.
Mcdonald, N., The Role of Due Diligence In International Law, Cambridge University Press for the British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2019, pp. 1041-1054.
Rajput, A., Due Diligence in International Investment Law – from the law of aliens to responsible investment, in Krieger, H. and Peters, A. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order, Oxford University Press, 2020.
Already registered ?