Picture of Partner
This document is part of the ICC Dispute Resolution Library.
Cover Photo
Publisher: Image of Publisher which is The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC DRL)
Type: Books
Publication Date: 2015
Language: English


This book celebrates John Beechey's distinguished service as President of the ICC International Court of Arbitration.

It is the tribute of many of John's colleagues and friends to his inspiration, his achievements and his abiding commitment to efficiency and quality, which has been the hallmark of his entire career in international arbitration.

This collection of 34 articles provides informed commentary by leading arbitration specialists on some of today's most pressing subjects, including procedural efficiency, arbitrator independence and investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS).

The book also contains articles on arbitral appeal procedures, responsibilities of institutions, dissenting opinions, remission of awards and party representation by foreign lawyers.

Table of content

ICC Arbitration from a CIS Perspective: If Not Faster and Cheaper, Why Choose It?

1. Introduction


A common refrain heard in discussions on the advantages of international arbitration over litigation is that international arbitration is a faster and less expensive way of resolving disputes. For this reason, many users, especially in Russia and other former Soviet Union republics, ask for a comparison of the costs and duration of proceedings under different institutions before opting for one or other of them. Arbitration under the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce ('ICC Rules') does not come out of this comparison well. Not only is it more expensive (Figure 1), but also leads to lengthier proceedings than under the rules of other international arbitration institutions. In our experience, it takes at least one and a half to two years from the date the case is filed to obtain an ICC award.

If the cost and duration of the proceedings were the only criteria considered by the parties when choosing an arbitration institution, the ICC International Court of Arbitration ('ICC Court') would have long been discounted as a realistic option, at least in CIS countries. Yet this has not been the case: despite growing competition among arbitration institutions, the ICC Court has held its own, as seen in Figure 2. Furthermore, the 2015 International Arbitration Survey by the School of International Arbitration, Queen Mary, University of London, showed that two-thirds of the corporations polled named the ICC as one of their top three choices.

Hoping to view more? Discover the ICC Dispute Resolution Library.

This feature requires a subscription

Get access to the most extensive & reliable source of information in arbitration


Already registered ?

Select a key word :
1 /