The SCC Arbitration Institute (SCC) is an institution established, in 1917, to administer arbitration proceedings. Though the SCC is established as a part of the Chamber of Commerce, the SCC is independent from the Chamber of Commerce in its function. The SCC consists of a Board and a Secretariat to efficiently handle arbitration proceedings. The SCC handles both commercial arbitration (dispute between private parties) and investment arbitration (dispute between a foreign investor and a State).1
Note that the SCC recently published Rules for express dispute assessment, an alternative tool "between mediation and arbitration that provides parties with a legal assessment or resolution of their dispute in three weeks, at a predictable cost."
About the SCC, Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce; SCC Rules for Express Dispute Assessment, May 2021; Guidelines to the SCC Rules for Express Dispute Assessment.
The SCC has adopted rules, namely the SCC Arbitration Rules, to govern arbitration proceedings initiated at the SCC. Appendix III to the SCC Arbitration Rules provides for special rules applicable in case of investment arbitration like setting the default number of arbitrators as three, rules for submissions by a third person and submissions by a non-disputing treaty party.2 The SCC has also adopted Mediation Rules to govern mediations instituted under these rules.3
The SCC is referred as a forum for the resolution of disputes between an investor and a host State in about 120 investment protection treaties.4 Under these treaties, the SCC is responsible for conducting the investment arbitration in a smooth and efficient manner according to the SCC Arbitration Rules. In other treaties, the SCC functions as an Appointing Authority.5 Under these treaties, the SCC would only facilitate the constitution of the arbitral tribunal and has no role in the administration of arbitration proceedings.
Energy Charter Treaty (1994), Art. 26.4.c; Agreement between the Governments of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and of the Kingdom of Belgium and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Concerning the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments (1989), Art. 10.2.1; Agreement between the Government of the Polish People's Republic, on the one hand, the Government of the Kingdom of Belgium and the Government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, on the other hand, Concerning the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments (1987), Art. 9.2.a; Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (1989), Art. 8.3.a; Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Republic of Moldova on Promotion and Mutual Protection of Capital Investment (1998), Art. 10.2.b; Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (1990), Art. 8.2.b; Agreement between USSR and Spain for the Protection and Promotion of the Investments (1990), Art. 10.2; Jordan- Poland BIT (1997), Article 7(2); Croatia-Slovenia BIT (1997), Article 8(2); Algeria-Spain BIT (1994), Article 11(2); Egypt-Sri Lanka BIT (1996), Article 8(2); ECOWAS Energy Protocol, Article 26(4); Hong Kong, China SAR - United Arab Emirates BIT (2019), Article 8 (5); Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Website, Investment Dispute.
China-Italy BIT, Protocol, Ad Art. 5(ii)(a); Federal Republic of Germany and Union of Soviet Socialist Republics - Agreement Concerning the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (1989), Art. 10(4); Agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany and the State of Kuwait for the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (1994), Art. 8(5)(a); Czech Republic-Germany BIT (1990), Art. 10(2); Agreement between the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of the Republic of Ghana Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (1989), Art. 10.2; Bulgaria-Egypt BIT (1998), Art. 9.2; Bulgaria-China BIT (1989), Art. 9.2; Algeria-Jordan BIT (1996), Art. 7.2; China-Norway BIT (1984), Protocol, 2.d; China-Malaysia BIT (1988), Art. 7.4; Bangladesh-Italy BIT (1990), Protocol, 2.a; China-Mauritius BIT (1996), Art. 13(5); Egypt-Italy BIT (1989), Protocol, 4(a); China-Kuwait BIT (1985), Art. 8(3); Barbados-Italy BIT (1995), Protocol, 2.a; Italy-Kuwait BIT (1987), Protocol, 4(a); Bulgaria-Germany BIT (1986), Protocol, Ad Art. 4(b); Poland-United Arab Emirates BIT (1993), Art. 9(3)(a); Italy-United Arab Emirates BIT (1995), Protocol, 2(a); Germany-Poland BIT (1989), Art. 11.4; Mauritius-Pakistan BIT (1997), Art. 8.5; Denmark-Kuwait BIT (2001), Art. 10(6)(b); Kuwait-Malta BIT (1995), Protocol, 5(b); Belarus-United Arab Emirates BIT (2000), Art. 8.3; China-United Arab Emirates BIT (1993), Art. 9(3); Ukraine - United Arab Emirates BIT (2003), Article 9.
The SCC has handled investment arbitrations under the Energy Charter Treaty6 and many bilateral investment treaties7 (for example: Czech Republic-United Kingdom BIT, USSR-Spain BIT, Russian Federation-United Kingdom BIT, Kazakhstan-United States of America BIT, Republic of Moldova- Russian Federation BIT). In some investment arbitrations handled by the SCC, the arbitration clause is part of the investment contract.8
Mohammad Ammar Al-Bahloul v. The Republic of Tajikistan, SCC Case No. 064/2008, Final Award, 8 June 2010; Ascom Group S.A., Anatolie Stati, Gabriel Stati and Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd. v. Republic of Kazakstan, SCC 116/2010, Award, 19 December 2013; Foresight Luxembourg Solar 1 S.À.R.L., et al. v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case No. 2015/150, Final Award, 14 November 2018; State Enterprise Energorynok v. the Republic of Moldova, SCC Case No. 2012/175, Final Award, 29 January 2015; Isolux Infrastructure Netherlands BV v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case No. V2013/153, Award, 12 July 2016; Charanne B.V. and Construction Investments S.A.R.L. v. Spain, SCC Case No. 062/2012, Final Award, 21 January 2016; Greentech Energy Systems A/S, NovEnergia II Energy & Environment (SCA) SICAR, and NovEnergia II Italian Portfolio SA v. The Italian Republic, SCC Case No. V2015/095, Award, 23 December 2018; CEF Energia BV v. Italian Republic, SCC Case No. 2015/158, Award, 16 January 2019; Novenergia II - Energy & Environment (SCA) (Grand Duchy of Luxembourg), SICAR v. The Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case No. 2015/063, Final Award, 15 February 2018; Cem Cengiz Uzan v. Republic of Turkey, SCC Case No. 2014/023, Award, 20 April 2016; Petrobart Limited v. The Kyrgyz Republic (II), SCC Case No. 126/2003, Award, 29 March 2005; Limited Liability Company Amto v. Ukraine, SCC Case No. 080/2005, Final Award, 26 March 2008; Nykomb Synergetics Technology Holding AB v. The Republic of Latvia, SCC Case No. 118/2001, Arbitral Award, 16 December 2003; SunReserve Luxco Holdings SRL v. Italy, SCC Case No. 132/2016, Final Award, 25 March 2020; JKX Oil & Gas plc, Poltava Gas B.V. and Poltava Petroleum Company v. Ukraine, SCC Case No. EA 2015/002, Award, 6 February 2017; Remington Worldwide Limited v. Ukraine, SCC Case No. V116/2008, Final Award, 28 April 2011; Mercuria Energy Group Limited v. Republic of Poland, Final Award, 1 December 2011; Festorino Invest Limited, Fosontal Limited, Petry Salesny, Peter Derendinger and Petra Roijcka v. The Republic of Poland, SCC Case No. 2018/098, Award, 30 June 2021; FREIF Eurowind Holdings Ltd v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case No. 2017/060, Final Award, 8 March 2021; CSP Equity Investment Sarl v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case No. 094/2013, Award, 16 November 2021; Green Power K/S and SCE Solar Don Benito APS v. Kingdom of Spain, SCC Case No. V2016/135, Award, 16 June 2022; Jus Mundi search engine - SCC Rules and ECT.
J.P. Busta and I.P. Busta v. The Czech Republic, SCC Case No. 2015/014, Final Award, 10 March 2017; Quasar de Valores SICAV S.A., Orgor de Valores SICAV S.A., GBI 9000 SICAV S.A. and ALOS 34 S.L. v. The Russian Federation, SCC Case No. 24/2007, Award, 20 July 2012; RosInvestCo UK Ltd. v. The Russian Federation, SCC Case No. 079/2005, Final Award, 12 September 2010; CCL Oil v. Republic of Kazakhstan, SCC Case No. 122/2001, Final Award, 1 January 2004; PL Holdings S.a.r.l. v. Poland, SCC Case No. V 2014/163, Final Award, 28 September 2017; Anglia Auto Accessories Limited v. The Czech Republic, SCC Case No. 2014/181, Final Award, 10 March 2017; Iurii Bogdanov and Yulia Bogdanova v. Republic of Moldova (IV), SCC Case No. 091/2012, Final Award, 16 April 2013; Vladimir Berschader and Moïse Berschader v. Russian Federation, SCC Case No. 080/2004, Award, 21 April 2006; William Nagel v. The Czech Republic, SCC Case No. 049/2002, Final Award, 9 September 2003; Puma Energy Holdings SARL v. the Republic of Benin, SCC Case No. SCC EA 2017/092, Emergency Award, 8 June 2017; Iurii Bogdanov v. Republic of Moldova (III), SCC Case No. 114/2009, Final Award, 30 March 2010; Robert Aleksandrowicz and Tomasz Częścik v. Cyprus, SCC Case No. V 2014/169, Award, 11 February 2017; Seventhsun Holding Ltd, Jevelinia Ltd, Aventon Ltd, Stanorode Ltd and Wildoro Ltd v. Poland, Partial Award, 13 October 2015; Iurii Bogdanov, Agurdino-Invest Ltd. and Agurdino-Chimia JSC v. Republic of Moldova (I), SCC Case No. 093/2004, Award, 22 September 2005; Eastern Sugar B.V. v. The Czech Republic, SCC Case No. 088/2004, Final Award, 12 April 2007; Mr. Franz Sedelmayer v. The Russian Federation, Arbitration Award, 7 July 1998; Yury Ghenadevich Bogdanov v. Government of the Republic of Moldova (V), SCC Case No. V 2022/162, Award, 29 September 2014; Biedermann International, Inc. v. The Republic of Kazakhstan and The Association for Social and Economic Development of Western Kazakhstan "Intercaspian", SCC Case No. 97/1996, Award, 1 January 1999; Trinh Vinh Binh and Binh Chau Joint Stock Company v. Socialist Republic of Viet Nam, Award, 14 March 2007; Iurii Bogdanov, Agurdino-Invest Ltd. and Agurdino-Chimia JSC v. Republic of Moldova (II), Award, 31 January 2006.
Gardabani Holdings B.V. v. Government of Georgia, Ministry of Economy and State Service Bureau LLC, SCC Case No. V2018/039, Notice of Arbitration, 9 June 2017, para. 5; OAO Gazprom v. The Republic of Lithuania, SCC Case No. V125/2011, Final Award, 31 July 2012, para. 45; I.M. Badprim S.R.L. v. the Russian Federation, SCC Case No. V172/2010, Final Award, 21 October 2013, para. 6; PJSC Inter RAO and Telasi JSC v. Government of Georgia, SCC Case No. V2018/039, Notice of Arbitration, 9 June 2017, para. 5; Norsk Hydro v State Property Fund of Ukraine & Others, Award, 20 March 2000.
The SCC also provides an emergency procedure for ISDS disputes.9 See further Emergency Arbitration
Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC).
Coe Jr., J.J., Procedural Issues in International Investment Arbitration, ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal, 2019, pp. 241-254.
Koh, S.Y., The Use of Emergency Arbitrators in Investment Treaty Arbitration, ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal, 2016, pp. 533-548.
Get access to the most extensive & reliable source of information in arbitration
REQUEST A FREE TRIALAlready registered ?