Social rights in international investment law falls into two categories of rights:
A number of bilateral and multilateral investment treaties refer to other norms such as international treaties on the protection of human rights,3 those that have been adopted by the ILO,4 national legislation5 or international standards on corporate social responsibility.6
Sometimes, the protection of social rights is indirectly targeted via references to public health,7 the environment8 and public interest.9
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) (1992), Preamble; Agreement between the United States of America, the United Mexican States, and Canada (USMCA) (2018), Preamble; Azerbaijan – United States of America BIT (1997), Preamble; 2004 US Model BIT, Preamble; 2012 US Model BIT, Preamble; Argentina – Chile FTA (2017), Preamble; Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations Plus (PACER Plus) (2017), Preamble; Israel – Japan BIT (2017), Preamble; Turkey – Uzbekistan BIT (2017), Preamble.
NAFTA (1992), Art. 1114; USMCA (2018), Arts. 14.16, 14.17; 2004 US Model BIT, Arts. 12, 13; 2012 US Model BIT, Arts. 12, 13; Argentina – Chile FTA (2017), Art. 8.17; 2012 SADC Model BIT, Art. 15; Morocco – Nigeria BIT (2016), Art. 18; Projet du code panafricain d’investissements (2016), Art. 24; Ecowas Supplementary Act on Investments (2008), Art. 14; Protocol for the Cooperation and the Facilitation of Investment within Mercosur (2017), Art. 14.2.b; 2015 India Bilateral Investment Model, Art. 12.
Free Trade Agreement between Canada and the Republic of Korea (2014), Preamble; Agreement for the Promotion and Protection of Investment between the Republic of Austria and the Federal Republic of Nigeria (2013), Preamble; Free Trade Agreement between the EFTA States and Georgia (2016), Preamble; Agreement between the Swiss Confederation and Georgia on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (2014), Preamble; Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between the Republic of Indonesia and the EFTA States (2018), Preamble; Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the One Part, and the Republic of Singapore, of the Other Part (2018), Preamble.
Free Trade Agreement between the EFTA States and Georgia (2016), Preamble; Economic Partnership Agreement between the CARIFORUM States, of the One Part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the Other Part (2019), Preamble, Art. 72; Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between the Republic of Indonesia and the EFTA States (2018), Preamble; Reciprocal Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Morocco and the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (2016), Art. 15(1); South Korea-the United States of America Free Trade Agreement (2007), Art. 19.2.
Agreement for the Promotion and Protection of Investment between the Republic of Austria and the Federal Republic of Nigeria (2013), Arts. 4-5; Reciprocal Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Morocco and the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (2016), Art. 15(2); Agreement for the Promotion and Protection of Investment Between the Government of the Republic of Austria and the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic (2016), Arts. 4-5; Agreement between the Slovak Republic and the Islamic Republic of Iran for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (2016), Preamble.
Free Trade Agreement between the EFTA States and Georgia (2016), Preamble; Agreement between the Swiss Confederation and Georgia on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (2014), Preamble; Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement between the Republic of Indonesia and the EFTA States (2018), Preamble; Reciprocal Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement Between the government of the Kingdom of Morocco and the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (2016), Article 24; The Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments between the Argentine Republic and the State of Qatar (2016), Article 12; Investment Agreement between the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China and the Government of the Republic of Chile (2016), Article 16; Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Belarus and the Government of Hungary for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (2019), Preamble.
Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part (2017), Art. 275(4), Chapter 3 on Environment, Arts. 45-50, Chapter 4 on Climate Action, Arts. 51-56; Free Trade Agreement Between China and Georgia (2017), Arts. 9.1–9.2; Reciprocal Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Morocco and the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (2016), Article 13(2); Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Turkey and the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh concerning the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments (2012), Article 4.
Admittedly, provisions on social rights are more frequent in the preambles of investment treaties and are often framed in non-binding language in the body of the treaty. When they are so worded, they do not create obligations per se. But they can be seen as means of interpreting other obligations.10
Coleman, J., Johnson, L., Sachs, L. and Gupta, K., International Investment Agreements, 2015–2016, A Review of Trends and New Approaches, Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2015-2016, pp. 2.81; Vidak-Gojkovic, E., Blair, C. and Meudic-Role, M., The Medium Is the Message: Establishing a System of Business and Human Rights Through Contract Law and Arbitration, in Maxi Scherer (ed), Journal of International Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 2018, pp. 384.
Reciprocal Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Morocco and the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (2016), Art. 18; Protocol for the Cooperation and the Facilitation of Investment within Mercosur (2017), Art. 14.2.b; ECOWAS Supplementary Act on Investments (2008), Article 14.
Portant Code des Investissements de la République de Guinée (2015), Art. 20; The Lao People’s Democratic Republic Law on Investment Promotion, 2016, Art. 73; Mongolia Law on Investment, 2013, Art. 7.2; The Law of the Republic of Tajikistan on Investments, 2007, Art. 20; Mozambique Law on Investment, 1993, Art. 26.3.
Often expressly excluded from investor-State arbitration,14 provisions relating to social rights sometimes provide for State parties to cooperate in monitoring compliance.15 They are sometimes subject to a consultation mechanism between States on an ad hoc or institutional basis. Some investment agreements establish panels of experts whose conclusions are binding16 or non-binding.17
Agreement between the Republic of Guatemala and the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago on the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments (2013), Art. 17; Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada and the European Union (2016), Art. 23.11; Free Trade Agreement between Canada and the Republic of Korea (2014), Art. 18.24.
First Periodic Review of Progress to Address Issues in the U.S. Department of Labor’s Public Report of Review of Submission 2016-02 (Colombia), 8 January 2018; Sixth Periodic Review of Implementation of Recommendations in the U.S. Department of Labor’s Public Report of Review of Submission 2011-03 (Dominican Republic), 16 May 2018; Mutually Agreed Enforcement Action Plan between the Government of the United States and the Government of Guatemala; Second Periodic Review of Progress to Address Issues Identified in the U.S. Department of Labor’s Public Report of Review of Submission 2015-01 (Peru), 20 April 2018.
Public Submission to the Office of Trade and Labor Affairs under Chapter 15 of the US-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement concerning the Failure of the Government of Bahrain to comply with its commitments under article 15.1 of the US-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement submitted by the American Federation of Labor and Congress of industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), 21 April 2011; Public Submission to the Office of Trade and Labor Affairs (OTLA) under Chapters 16 (Labor) and 20 (Dispute Settlement) of the Dominican Republic - Central America Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA) concerning the Failure of the Government Of Guatemala to effectively Enforce its Labor Laws and Comply with its Commitments under the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work Submitted by the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) and Union of Port Quetzal Company Workers (STEPQ), Union of Izabal Banana Workers (SITRABI), Union of Int’l Frozen Products, Inc. Workers (SITRAINPROCSA), Coalition of Avandia Workers, Union of Fribo Company Workers (SITRAFRIBO), Federation of Food and Similar Industries Workers of Guatemala (FESTRAS), 23 April 2008; Other submissions.
In the context of investor-State arbitration, social rights issues have been invoked by the respondent State as defense and/or as counterclaims based on the investor’s violation of obligations concerning the respect of social rights. Social rights have been invoked in arbitration cases mainly related to water and sanitation concessions,20 mining activities21 and tobacco packaging.22 In some cases in which the protection of social rights was at issue, the respondent State invoked its human rights obligations in general.23 See further Human rights in investment claims and Environmental issues in ISDS, Section VI.
Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S. A and Vivendi Universal S.A. v. Argentine Republic (II), ICSID Case No ARB/03/19, Decision on Liability, 30 July 2010, para. 252; Siemens A.G. v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award, 6 February 2007, paras. 74-75, 79; EDF International S.A., SAUR International S.A. and Leon Participaciones Argentinas S.A. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/23, Award, 11 June 2012, paras. 192-195; Impregilo S.p.A v. Argentine Republic (I), ICSID Case No. ARB/07/17, Award, 21 June 2011, para. 228; Urbaser S.A. and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Bizkaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/26, Award, 8 December 2016, paras. 648, 1156-1164.
Azurix Corp. v Argentine Republic (I), ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award, 14 July 2006, para. 254; CMS Gas Transmission Company v. The Argentina Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award, 12 May 2005, paras. 114, 121; Siemens A.G. v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award, 6 February 2007, paras. 74–75; Sempra Energy International v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/16, Award, 28 September 2007, para. 331.
Already registered ?