Rodrigo Oreamuno has been an arbitrator in at least 39 international cases known by Jus Mundi (37 Investor-State, 2 Commercial Arbitration). 2 of these cases are pending and 2 ICSID cases are pending annulment.
Decisions on annulment/set-aside applications were rendered in 11 of these cases. He has been challenged in 3 cases, of which 0 has been successful, and 0 is pending. He rendered 2 dissenting/individual opinions.
Jus Mundi's algorithms detected 63 arbitration practitioners who worked in the same firm(s) and/or acted as arbitrators, counsel, experts or secretaries in the same cases as Rodrigo Oreamuno.
Complete your case history to get more visibility
Join now to add any case to your profile without sacrificing confidentiality, including commercial arbitration cases, since we only collect non-confidential case information.
San José, Costa Rica
Jan 1964 → Present (58 yrs 11 mos)
Go Premium to unlock all profile analytics
The full access includes metrics on Status of Case, Role, Tribunal/Court/Institution, Applicable Treaty, Economic Sector.GO PREMIUM
List of cases (39)
Unlock the list of cases -
|Date Year of introduction or year of the first known document.||Case||Type of Case||Status||Institution||Role|
|2018||Hydrika v. Peru||Investor-State||Concluded (ISDS)||ICSID||Appointed by the Appointing Authority|
|2017||Premium||Commercial Arbitration||Premium||ICC||Appointed by the respondent|
|2016||Premium||Investor-State||Premium||ICSID||Appointed by the Appointing Authority|
|2015||Premium||Investor-State||Premium||ICSID||Challenged Arbitrator (unsuccessful)|
|2015||Premium||Investor-State||Premium||SCC||Appointed by the Appointing Authority|
|2015||Premium||Investor-State||Premium||ICSID||Appointed by the Appointing Authority|
|2014||Premium||Investor-State||Premium||ICSID||Appointed by the State|
|2014||Premium||Investor-State||Premium||PCA||Appointed by the Appointing Authority|