Jus Mundi
Jus Connect
  • FR
  • EN
Exact search Exclude grammatical variations of your search terms.

Intelligence

Jus Mundi Search logoSearchJus Mundi Wiki logoWiki NotesJus Mundi ICC Library logoICC DRLJus Mundi Juris Library logoJuris

Network

Jus Connect logoJus Connect

Tools

Jus Mundi Conflict Checker logoConflict CheckerJus Mundi Alerts logoMy Alerts

Our value for

  • Lawyers & Arbitrators
  • In-House Counsel
  • Arbitral Institutions

Partnerships

institutional

  • ICC
  • AAA-ICDR
  • See more

collaborative

  • IBA
  • CEA
  • See more

Coverage

  • Commercial Arbitration
  • Investment Arbitration
  • International Trade Law
  • PIL & Law of the Sea
Pricing

Company

  • About Us
  • Careers

Resources

  • Blog
  • Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Help Center
  • Tutorials
  • FR
  • EN
Log inRequest trial
Option not available in public versionOption not available in public versionOption not available in public version
Save to folder

The Appointment of Arbitrators the Court (in accordance with Article 2(6) of the Arbitration Rules)

ICC Logo

ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin Vol. 7 No. 2 - 1996 - Vol. 7 No. 2

32.Article 2(6) of the Rules states as follows:Where the Court is to appoint a sole arbitrator or the chairman of an arbitral tribunal, it shall make the appointment after having requested a proposal from a National Committee of the ICC that it considers to be appropriate. If the Court does not accept the proposal made, or if the said National Committee fails to make the proposal requested within the time limit fixed by the Court, the Court may repeat its request or may request a proposal from

Save to folder

Multiparty Arbitration and Multiple Arbitrations

ICC Logo

ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin Vol. 7 No. 2 - 1996 - Vol. 7 No. 2

45.In a classic dispute, one party to a contract (the claimant) is opposed to the other party to the same contract (the defendant). If the contract in question contains an arbitration clause referring to the ICC's Rules of Arbitration, normally each of the parties will nominate its own arbitrator. The two arbitrators selected in this way, will nominate the chairman of the arbitral tribunal.However, it is evident from arbitration practice that very often a dispute involves more than two parties.

Save to folder

The Place of Arbitration: A Review of the ICC Court's Guiding Principles and Practice when Fixing the Place of Arbitration

ICC Logo

ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin Vol. 7 No. 2 - 1996 - Vol. 7 No. 2

54.International arbitration offers the advantage - amongst others - over court-of-law proceedings of allowing parties a greater choice of forum. The parties are not limited to the other party's place of residence, or the place where that party has assets, as they normally are in litigation, but are free to agree on practically any place that suits them to hold the arbitration. The parties' scope of choice is much wider than it is in litigation thanks to the existence of a number of conventions

Save to folder

Ryan and others v. Poland

Decision Concerning Participation of Counsel, 1 July 2013


Save to folder

Terms of Reference: The Function of the International Court of Arbitration and Application of Article 16 the Arbitrators

ICC Logo

ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin Vol. 7 No. 2 - 1996 - Vol. 7 No. 2

59.One of the characteristic features of ICC arbitration are the Terms of Reference. Article 13 of the ICC Rules states:1Before proceeding with the preparation of the case, the arbitrator shall draw up, on the basis of the documents or in the presence of the parties and in the light of their most recent submissions, a document defining his Terms of Reference. This document shall include the following particulars:a) the full names and description of the parties;b) the addresses of the parties to

Save to folder

Werner Schneider v. Thailand

Decision of the US Distict Court for the Southern District of New York on the Enforcement of the Award, 17 March 2011


Save to folder

Rectification and Interpretation of Arbitral Awards

ICC Logo

ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin Vol. 7 No. 2 - 1996 - Vol. 7 No. 2

78.It is clear that there is an even greater need to interpret, rectify or amend clerical errors or omissions in the case of arbitral awards than there is in the case of decisions of the national courts. Indeed, not all arbitrators - far from it - have a mastery of the clear and precise language of the courts, and some make do with wording that is intelligible only to people involved in the profession concerned, which may appear incomprehensible to the national authorities charged with enforcing

Save to folder

Advance to Cover Costs of Arbitration

ICC Logo

ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin Vol. 7 No. 2 - 1996 - Vol. 7 No. 2

88.As a general rule, in the case of both institutional and ad hoc arbitrations, payments of advances to cover the costs of arbitration are required at the outset of the procedure. These advances are required for the purpose of securing in advance the financial resources necessary for carrying out the arbitration procedure. Hence the price for arbitration services is paid in advance. The arbitrators do not commence the proceedings until the advance has been paid. The advance usually comprises the

Save to folder

Werner Schneider v. Thailand

Judgment of Germany’s Federal Court of Justice, 6 October 2016


Save to folder

Thunderbird v. Mexico

Decision of the Tribunal on the Request for Interim measures, 26 November 2003


Add to Alerts
Discover the Search Engine in 3 minutes
Common
Date
Treaties
Cases
Type of case Option not available in public version
Tribunal/Court/Institution Option not available in public version
Rules of arbitration/Procedure Option not available in public version
Applicable treaty Option not available in public version
Applicable law Option not available in public version
Seat of arbitration Option not available in public version
Status of the case Option not available in public version
Economic sector Option not available in public version

Type of document Option not available in public version
Decision Option not available in public version
Opinion Option not available in public version
Other Option not available in public version
Section of decision Option not available in public version
Currently available for Investor-State decisions. Our algorithms are learning and will provide you with more options soon.

Party Option not available in public version

Please log in to continue

Party nationality Option not available in public version
Arbitrator/Judge Option not available in public version
Lawyer Option not available in public version
Expert Option not available in public version
Firm/Chamber/Organization/State Option not available in public version
Rules
Publications
Jus Mundi Logo

The Search Engine for
International Law & Arbitration

Chat with us

Product

  • Pricing
  • Request a demo
  • Search Engine
  • Wiki Notes
  • Jus Connect
  • States Profiles
  • Firms Profiles
  • Arbitral Institutions Profiles
  • Conflict Checker

Resources

  • Blog
  • ICC x Jus Mundi Partnership
  • IBA x Jus Mundi Partnership
  • ICDR x Jus Mundi Partnership
  • RAC x Jus Mundi Partnership
  • In-House Counsel
  • Help Center
  • Tutorials
  • Reports

Coverage

  • Investment Arbitration
  • Commercial Arbitration
  • PIL & Law of the Sea
  • International Trade Law

Company

  • About Us
  • We are hiring! ❤️
  • Subscribe to the Newsletter
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Charter
jus mundi has been featured in:
Forbes logoNew York Law journal logoMadyness logoBFM Business logoB Smart logo