the question of whether Catherine Etezadi has a legal interest in the subject matter of the Claim, as well as the question of whether her property rights, if any, were expropriated or otherwise affected by measures taken by Iran, belongs to the merits of the Case.... (Partial Award, supra, para. 19.)
THE TRIBUNAL AWARDS AS FOLLOWS:
(a) The Claims for the alleged expropriation of a 50 per cent share of a plot of land in Karaj, Iran, of a 10 per cent interest in Shiraz Plastic Products Corporation, and of the equity interest in a condominium in Tehran against the GOVERNMENT OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN are dismissed for lack of evidence.
(b) The Claim for a 50 per cent share of the terminated pension of the Claimant's husband, Hooshang Etezadi, as a retired employee of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Iran, against the GOVERNMENT OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN is dismissed.
(c) Each Party shall bear its own costs of arbitration.
Déjà enregistré ?