Copier la référence
Faites-nous vos retours
Tutoriel vidéo

Retrouvez toutes les vidéos du tutoriel Jus Mundi en : https://tutorial.jusmundi.com

En moins de 3 minutes, vous trouverez tout ce que vous devez savoir sur Jus Mundi et comment profiter pleinement de notre moteur de recherche.

ConocoPhillips v. Venezuela

ConocoPhillips Petrozuata B.V., ConocoPhillips Hamaca B.V. and ConocoPhillips Gulf of Paria B.V. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/30

Nature de la procédure :: Internationale

Type d'affaire :: Investisseur-État

Secteur économique :: Activités extractives; Extraction de pétrole brut et de gaz naturel (pétrole)

Date d'introduction :: 13 déc. 2007

Statut de l'affaire :: Pendante (Annulation)

Pays d'origine de l'investisseur :: Pays-Bas

Défendeur:: Venezuela

Institution:: CIRDI (Centre international pour le règlement des différends relatifs aux investissements)

Rules of arbitration:

Siège de l’arbitrage :: Washington D.C

Loi applicable :: Venezuela

Traités applicables :

Documents de l'affaire

Dissenting Opinion of Georges Abi-Saab (Decision on Jurisdiction and Merits)

Decision on Respondent's Request for Reconsideration - 10 mars 2014

Dissenting Opinion of Georges Abi-Saab (Decision on Respondent's Request for Reconsideration)

David R. Malpass	Président du Conseil d'administration
Diego P. Fernández Arroyo	Récusation de l'arbitre (refusée)
Dominique T. Hascher	Récusation de l'arbitre (refusée)

Origine(s) du ou des documents :

Reproduit avec l'autorisation du Centre international pour le règlement des différends relatifs aux investissements :

Lien1 (EN) ^{Source officielle}

Avocats, autres représentants, expert(s), secrétaire du tribunal

Investisseur(s)

Voir le(s)
Investisseur(s)

État(s)

Voir le(s)
État(s)

Decision of the Chairman of the Administrative Council on the Disqualification of Judge Dominique Hascher and Professor Diego Fernández Arroyo

[1].

Dear Mesdames and Sirs,

[2].

I refer to the Proposal for the Disqualification of Judge Hascher and Professor Fernández Arroyo filed on June 12, 2022 by De Jesús Law Firm on behalf of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (the "Proposal").

[3].

The Proposal was submitted pursuant to Articles 14 and 57 of the ICSID Convention and ICSID Arbitration Rule 9. Pursuant to Article 57, a party may propose the disqualification of an arbitrator on account of any fact indicating a manifest lack of the qualities required by Article 14(1).

[4].

Pursuant to Article 58 of the Convention and Arbitration Rule 9, the Chair of the ICSID Administrative Council shall decide the Proposal.

[5].

On July 22, 2022, the Centre informed the parties of my decision to seek a recommendation on the Proposal from Judge Ian Binnie, former Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. The Centre confirmed that the final decision on the Proposal would be taken by the Chair of the ICSID Administrative Council in accordance with Article 58 of the ICSID Convention.

[6].

The parties have been given a full opportunity to present their positions on this matter. The Centre provided Judge Binnie with copies of all parties' submissions on the Proposal and the explanations furnished by Judge Hascher and Professor Fernández Arroyo.

[7].

The Centre received the recommendation from Judge Binnie on September 16, 2022. A copy of the recommendation is attached.

[8].

I have carefully considered the Proposal, having regard to the parties' written arguments, the explanations furnished by Judge Hascher and Professor Fernández Arroyo, and the recommendation from Judge Binnie. Based on these materials, I have concluded that the Proposal does not meet the standard for disqualification set forth in Article 57 of the ICSID Convention.

[9].

Accordingly, the Proposal is hereby rejected.

Citations postérieures de ce document dans sa totalité :

Citations postérieures de cet extrait :