Copier la référence
Faites-nous vos retours
Tutoriel vidéo

Retrouvez toutes les vidéos du tutoriel Jus Mundi en : https://tutorial.jusmundi.com

En moins de 3 minutes, vous trouverez tout ce que vous devez savoir sur Jus Mundi et comment profiter pleinement de notre moteur de recherche.

ConocoPhillips v. Venezuela

ConocoPhillips Petrozuata B.V., ConocoPhillips Hamaca B.V. and ConocoPhillips Gulf of Paria B.V. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/30

Nature de la procédure :: Internationale

Type d'affaire :: Investisseur-État

Secteur économique :: Activités extractives; Extraction de pétrole brut et de gaz naturel (pétrole)

Date d'introduction :: 13 déc. 2007

Statut de l'affaire :: Pendante (Annulation)

Pays d'origine de l'investisseur :: Pays-Bas

Défendeur:: Venezuela

Institution:: CIRDI (Centre international pour le règlement des différends relatifs aux investissements)

Rules of arbitration:

Siège de l’arbitrage :: Washington D.C

Loi applicable :: Venezuela

Traités applicables :

Documents de l'affaire

Dissenting Opinion of Georges Abi-Saab (Decision on Jurisdiction and Merits)

Decision on Respondent's Request for Reconsideration - 10 mars 2014

Dissenting Opinion of Georges Abi-Saab (Decision on Respondent's Request for Reconsideration)

David R. Malpass	Président du Conseil d'administration
Dominique T. Hascher	Récusation de l'arbitre (refusée)
Diego P. Fernández Arroyo	Récusation de l'arbitre (refusée)
Kap-You (Kevin) Kim	Récusation de l'arbitre (refusée)

Origine(s) du ou des documents :

Reproduit avec l'autorisation du Centre international pour le règlement des différends relatifs aux investissements :

Lien1 (EN) ^{Source officielle}

Avocats, autres représentants, expert(s), secrétaire du tribunal

Investisseur(s)

Voir le(s)
Investisseur(s)

État(s)

Voir le(s)
État(s)

Chair's Decision on the Proposal for Disqualification

[1].

I refer to the Proposal for the Disqualification of the Members of the Annulment Committee submitted on April 16, 2020 by Dr. Alfredo De Jesús O. on behalf of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (the "Proposal").

[2].

The Proposal was submitted pursuant to Articles 14 and 57 of the ICSID Convention and ICSID Arbitration Rule 9. Pursuant to Article 57, a party may propose the disqualification of an arbitrator on account of any fact indicating a manifest lack of the qualities required by Article 14(1).

[3].

Pursuant to Article 58 of the Convention and Arbitration Rule 9, the Chair of the ICSID Administrative Council shall decide the Proposal.

[4].

By communication of June 5, 2020, the Centre informed the parties of my decision to seek a recommendation on the Proposal from The Rt Hon. Lord Nicholas Phillips, past President of the Supreme Court of England and Wales. The Centre confirmed that the final decision on the Proposal would be taken by the Chairman of the ICSID Administrative Council in accordance with Article 58 of the ICSID Convention.

[5].

The parties have been given a full opportunity to present their positions on this matter. The Centre provided Lord Phillips with copies of all the parties' submissions on the Proposal and the explanations furnished by the arbitrators.

[6].

The Centre received the recommendation from Lord Phillips on July 10, 2020. A copy of the recommendation is attached.

[7].

I have carefully considered the Proposal, in light of the parties' written arguments, the arbitrators' explanations, and the recommendation from Lord Phillips. Based on these materials, I have concluded that the Proposal does not meet the standard set forth in Article 57 of the ICSID Convention for the disqualification of an arbitrator.

[8].

Accordingly, the Proposal is hereby rejected.

Citations postérieures de ce document dans sa totalité :

Citations postérieures de cet extrait :